First draft of Narnia map
Nov. 1st, 2008 10:22 amAnd so Trojie didst upload her first version of the map, and beg everyone's indulgence for the fact that a) Lantern Waste is off the page to the west, and that b) she has NO justification for why the Shribble is there except. well, how far can a giant owl with a child on its back fly, anyway? And for the fact that the Glasswater is so huge; it has to be, trust me, because it has to pass within fifteen miles of Aslan's How. Oh, and the scale at the bottom reads 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 miles. I'm sorry it's so small.

no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:29 pm (UTC)One of those questions you never expect to be asking...
Anyway, the map looks grand.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:37 pm (UTC)Technically I doubt that a giant owl can fly at all, given that there's an upper limit to the size a flying bird can be; the largest one I know of is the extinct Haast's eagle (Harpagornis moorei) which had a wingspan of twelve feet. Any bigger than that and the bird's just too heavy to fly. So a bird big enough to support a child of at least, say, ten (though probably more like twelve or thirteen, I suspect) on its back simply won't have the strength to lift both the child and itself; a swan (specifically Cygnus olor) is about 30kg and one of the largest flying birds currently alive; it needs to take off from the surface of a watercourse because the ground is too lumpy for it to be able to get up enough speed to launch. So I doubt that even if the owls could get aloft with these kids on their back that they could have got far; I've put the Shribble about 60-70 miles from Cair Paravel because it seems to have been hinted that it's a long way between the two places.
WHY DO I THINK ABOUT THESE THINGS? I SHOULD BE PREPARING MY PROPOSAL, NOT WORRYING ABOUT FICTIONAL OWLS FLYING OVER FICTIONAL RIVERS!
of course, two owls could carry a child between them on a length of creeper, held under the dorsal guiding feathers...
OH GOD KILL ME NOW.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 11:44 pm (UTC)And then I'd have no choice but to cling to driftwood, wash up on an island, live off breadfruit and tree-climbing crabs for a year, build a raft and set sail for land once more.
Naturally the raft would be christened 'Ed/Caspian'.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:40 pm (UTC)And good luck with your proposal, whenever you get around to it.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:48 pm (UTC)I *will* get round to it this weekend, I'm even working on it today, despite Google Scholar's uselessness...
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:51 pm (UTC)Am rambling. Sorry. When you have time, will you tell me what this proposal is actually about? I'm all curious.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:57 pm (UTC)I will be posting about the PhD proposal as soon as I have it straight in my head and my ideas approved by the supervisors, so sometime this week, I hope. I *can* tell you that it's on the morphometrics, taxonomy and evolution of the bivalve genus Spissatella :)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 07:20 pm (UTC)taxonomy; the science that involves working out the what constitutes a species and how various species are related
evolution; the origin of new species through descent with modification
bivalve; a mollusc of the class Bivalvia; has two plate-like shells (valves). Examples; scallop, clam, mussel.
Spissatella; a NZ-only genus of said class Bivalvia
that help? :P
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 10:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-04 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:38 pm (UTC)True, Glasswater does strike me as oddly big - yes, of course I trust you - but what struck me first is that its path seems so parallel to the Great River (blech! Every time I say that I'm tempted to type "the Anduin" instead. Grr.) - like train tracks. That's what struck me first. Not necessarily a bad thing! Just saying.
And no wories about the sie. Me has good eyes.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:44 pm (UTC)The topography suggested in the books puts high ground to the north and to the southwest of the Great RIver, meaning that both the Glasswater and the GR are lying in the lowest part of what is, I am increasingly starting to think, a glacial valley, or possibly even a fiord with more recent volcanics .. OH MY GOD THAT'S IT
*rushes away*
*realises she hasn't finished, and rushes back*
I actually suspect that the the Rush and the Glasswater have a common source in the Archenland mountains....
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:49 pm (UTC)I think I get it. I suppose it'll be easier for us not-inside-your-head people to understand once you've got more topography in there; land heights and all that.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-31 10:55 pm (UTC)*goes off to ponder Epiphany some more*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 03:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 04:13 am (UTC)There are SO molllusc beds in the sandstone/siltstone sequences on the coast around Cair Paravel. You know it's true.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-03 12:08 am (UTC)